[Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250





--- Comment #31 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr>  2008-10-04 12:56:25 EDT ---
* rpmlint output ignorable: 
librep-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
librep-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
emacs-librep-el.i386: W: no-documentation
X free software, but license should be included
* follow guidelines
* match upstream (checked manually)
* usual .so unuseful provides
X directory %{_libdir}/rep/%{version}/ unowned.

# rpm -qf /usr/lib/rep/0.17.2/
file /usr/lib/rep/0.17.2 is not owned by any package

I would suggest putting AUTHORS MAINTAINERS in %doc. And maybe doc/*.

2 issues marked with X to be fixed before approval.


And also before approval there are multilib issues remaining:

In librep.pc there is no Libs: entry???

The file /usr/bin/rep-config will conflict in multilib settings, 
on fedora it would be better to patch it such that it is a wrapper 
around pkgconfig, and you can submit to upstream the resulting rep-config
script such that they also ship it, and packagers can choose what to 
install.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.