[Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 6 14:45:04 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-10-06 10:45:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > * Naming
> > - First of all, why is this srpm named as "bouncycastle-mail",
> > not "bcmail"?
> >
> Let me tell you the situation. The actual Bouncy Castle is a suite consisting
> of many libraries. bcprov* and bcmail are two of these libraries among many
> others. In Fedora, the bcprov library is already packed as
> "bouncycastle.<version>.rpm" but not "bcprov.<version>.rpm".
>
> Let me know what you think.
- It may be better that "Provides: bcmail = %{version}-%{release}" is
added (if you think if it is worth doing)
> I added the if-clauses "%if %{with_gcj}" as the guidelines propose but this
> results in the rpmlint warning:
> bouncycastle-mail.spec:98: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package
> %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
> which is a wrong warning because noarch does not apply to that line (is this an
> rpmlint bug?). Should I take those "%if %{with_gcj}" off from the spec file?**
- Please ignore this rpmlint complaint for this case. You can also use
----------------------------------------------------------
%if %{with_gcj}
%{_javadir}/gcj-endorsed/bcmail-%{version}.jar
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
%endif
----------------------------------------------------------
> *bcprov is the main library. The other libraries depend on it and they don't
> mean anything without it.
- Then perhaps "Requires: bouncycastle (= %{version})" is needed?
Other things are okay.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This package (bouncycastle-mail) is APPROVED by mtasaka
-------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way would you have some time to review my review request
(bug 465740)?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list