[Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 10 13:36:10 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-10-10 09:36:08 EDT ---
Some comments:

* About versioning
  - Some maintaners use (and I recomment):
    0-0.X.<cvs related number>%{?dist}

* native2ascii
  - build.log shows:
-------------------------------------------------
    30  + find . -name '*.java' -exec native2ascii '{}' '{}' ';'
    31  find: `native2ascii'
    32  : Permission denied
    33  find: `native2ascii'
    34  : Permission denied
    35  find: `native2ascii'
....
-------------------------------------------------
    Can these messages be ignored?

* Font .pfb
  - Would you check how these fonts file (binaries) are
    used?
    * If these files can be removed, please remove these.
    * If these files are really used, please replace these
      with fonts which are system-widely provided.
      These fonts are all in urw-fonts (i.e. BR: urw-fonts is
      needed if these fonts are needed). BaseFonts.properties
      also needs fixing in this case.
      And as (rpm says) urw-fonts are under GPL+,
      the license tag of this package should be changed to
      "LGPLv2+ and GPL+".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list