[Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 22 19:51:32 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531





--- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr>  2008-10-22 15:51:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Please tell on fedora-devel that you are orphaning vnc, maybe there will
> > be takers (for F11). If so, I think that it would be better in any case to 
> > have a regular review done, so keeping this closed and not reviewed is the 
> > best solution in my opinion.
> 
> Well, this is not solution. tightvnc is forked vnc so both packages have same
> code, same binaries etc. So we have to have vnc or tightvnc but not both.

They can be made parallel installable and use alternatives, for example. 
Or simply have realvnc binaries prefixed. You are orphaning vnc, please
follow the procedures.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list