[Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892





--- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker <sahartsu at xs4all.nl>  2008-10-22 18:09:39 EDT ---
RPM Lint: quiet
Package name: ok
Spec file: ok
License: wrong
Actual License: Dual license Ruby and MIT
%doc License: n/a
Spec file language: ok
Spec file readable: ok
Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: 214b9e794a3d0b71d63f0d26a500e00e)
Compile and Build:
 - F-8: ok
 - F-9: ok
 - F-10: ok
 - rawhide: ok 
 - EL-5: n/a

Applicable Package Guidelines: ok

Locales: n/a
Shared libs: n/a

Relocatable: no
Directory and file ownership: ok
No duplicate files in %files: ok
File Permissions: ok
Macro usage: ok
Code vs. Content: ok
(Large) Documentation: n/a
%doc affecting runtime: ok
Header files in -devel package: n/a
Static Libraries in -static package: n/a
pkgconfig Requires: n/a
Library files: n/a
Devel requires base package: n/a
.la libtool archives: n/a
Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok
Remove BuildRoot: ok
UTF-8 filenames: ok

the MIT-LICENSE file is not marked as %doc
The spec file in the above post from Jeroen is not the same as the spec used in
building the srpm...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.