[Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074





--- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org>  2008-10-28 15:12:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> cddlib-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo suggests I should look for -s
being passed to gcc or ld, or strip being called somewhere. I'm now building in
mock to be able to grep over a build.log for these.

> The file:
> examples-ml/Combinatorica5.m
> Cannot be included in Fedora cue to the following licensing clause:
> 
> This package may be copied in its entirety for nonprofit purposes only.
> Sale, other than for the direct cost of the media, is prohibited.  This
> copyright notice must accompany all copies.

Good spot. Will rm in prep.

> Why -devel and not -static, as there are no solibs?

"2. Static libraries only.
When a package only provides static libraries you can place all the static
library files in the *-devel subpackage. When doing this you also must have a
virtual Provide for the *-static package." from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries

My personal reason? There are header files too, therefore it's useful for
devel.

> I'm ok with the docs/examples being bundled, they're not that big, left to
> packager discretion IMHO.
> 
> Otherwise, a good review.  Checking mock BRs, will be slightly delayed there
> due to system issues. :(

Thanks for helping Paulo out. I appreciate the input from both of you!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.