[Bug 469134] New: Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 30 03:40:45 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134
Summary: Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for
various archive formats for use of deco
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive.spec
SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description:
deco-archive provides support for popular archive
formats to the deco file extraction framework.
--
This package is a companion to deco (Bug# 444366). Neither packages mean much
without each other hence I made them require and block each other. If you have
a better idea for the dependencies I am wide open to accept.
There are three types of rpmlint errors/warnings from the deco-archive package
that will be built, which can all be ignored:
* deco.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger
I used the %trigger functions for installing support for "non-default"
formats as Ville suggested in Bug# 444366 . This results in these
"dangerous commands".
* deco.x86_64: E: zero-length
All zero length files are needed by the program
* deco.x86_64: E: compressed-symlink-with-wrong-ext
These kinds of files are needed by the program too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list