[Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 3 08:56:02 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946


Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |akurtako at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com>  2009-04-03 04:56:01 EDT ---
Formal review:
# OK: rpmlint gives no warnings/errors
# OK: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
# OK: The spec file match the base package %{name}
# OK: EPL
# OK: Every subpackage has it's own license shipping with it and included in
%doc.
# OK: The spec file must be written in American English. 
# OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
# OK: Fetch script shipped in the srpm.
# OK: Builds fine.
# OK: All BuildRequires and Requires are fine
# OK: Owns all folders.
# OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
# OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
# OK: Each package must have a %clean section
# OK: Each package must consistently use macros. 
# OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
# OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. 
# OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 

Package is good to go.

Mat, just FYI,
If this package is going to be available only F-11+, you can remove -a
"-DjavacTarget=1.5 -DjavacSource=1.5" parts. This is added automatically from
pdebuild script when needed in F-11.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list