[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 7 11:28:28 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283





--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember <kalev at smartlink.ee>  2009-04-07 07:28:27 EDT ---
I am familiar with the HowToGetSponsored page and I do have an FAS account for
a while now. Please see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/kalev

So far I have posted 3 packages for review (and they all block FE-NEEDSPONSOR).
Besides the mingw32-libp11 I have:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-opensc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=powwow

I have also done a few unofficial reviews and commented in some bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122

In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-cairomm I did the
official review. Richard Jones checked on my review and set the fedora‑review+
flag for me.

Regarding this package here, I discussed the situation with Richard Jones and
he suggested that he could try setting the fedora‑cvs? flag as I still don't
have a sponsor, that's the reason I posted the CVS request too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list