[Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 14 21:47:12 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995





--- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net>  2009-04-14 17:47:11 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> >> please use commands like they are, not as a macro.
> >> make instead of %{__make}
> > OK, but what's wrong with using macros?
> Nothing, it's just a sugestion. I would prefer make, so I tried to convince
> you. If you don't like it, you can use macros of course, if you want.

Changed.

> >> %defattr(644,root,root,755)
> >> please use %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> > Why?
> This is the part you should answer why you are not using
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions
> If you have a good reason to differ from default, I will have no problem with
> this.

I don't. Changed.

> > No, it has its own implementation. I'm not sure if it makes sense to ask
> > upstream to use libtlen because libtlen hasn't been updated in quite a while.
> That puts another complexion on the matter.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries

It's not duplication, because the code is different (only auth.c is taken from
an older release of libtlen). Anyway, I've sent upstream an email asking about
libtlen usage.

http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pidgin-tlen.spec
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pidgin-tlen-0-0.2.20090209.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list