[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422





--- Comment #59 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com>  2009-04-17 11:18:17 EDT ---
rpmlint on rpm package (not installed) built for local mock for F-11 x86_64.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 377 errors, 5 warnings.

There is 3 common cases for the errors:
1/ songbird.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/mangle ['/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2',
'$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
Whereas the /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2 rpath was expected to use the internal
xulrunner, the others are what the rpath policy expect to have removed. There
is a need to track why thoses additionals rpathes are added.

2/ songbird.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/dictionaries/en-US.aff
Thoses files need to be chmod -x

3/songbird-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-readable
/usr/src/debug/Songbird1.1.2/dependencies/vendor/xulrunner/mozilla/xpcom/glue/pldhash.c
0640
The source code (ending in -debuginfo sub-package) need to be publicly
accessible (0644)

4/songbird.x86_64: W: no-soname
/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/lib/sbGStreamerMediacore.so
This one is a warning only... As I understand, it is meant to be dlopened and
isn't registered as a system library; also, it doesn't have a SOVERSION.
So this is acceptable for me.

I still need to have rpmlint on installed files and runtime testing on F-11
x86_64

@Jasper
I never experienced such problem in my case, either rpmbuild, mock or koji
built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.