[Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850





--- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-04-17 11:48:49 EDT ---
Thanks for the update.

(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> 
> > ! Could you collect all your "%global"s at one place?
> 
> The globals are now first in the file (which seems to be the custom nowadays).
> Except for the global that defines %_name which must come after the Name tag,
> since it uses %name in its definition and this is not defined before the Name
> tag is parsed. This is also the most logical place for it.
> 

This shouldn't matter for rpm, i.e. rpm doesn't needs these to be in logical
order. But it's a matter of taste. I won't say anything more.

I have one last question:

> 
> > ? Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. 
> >    /usr/share/globus and /usr/share/globus/packages is already owned by
> > globus-core. Shouldn't you just put globus-core as a requirement to this
> > package? Is this package useful without globus-core?  
> 
> globus-core is a development only package. globus-openssl and
> globus-openssl-progs are runtime packages. Runtime packages must not Require
> development packages.
> 

How about globus-common? That one is a runtime package and "sounds" like the
one all the other globus packages would require. Multiple ownership is not much
desired that's why I'm asking. Is the globus-openssh package worth anything
without having globus-common installed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.