[Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 22 15:06:21 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |iarnell at gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com>  2009-04-22 11:06:20 EDT ---
+ source files match upstream.  
  5073ae91074a41dd1e6d22c0cf2a6934f0bb3a39  Text-VimColor-0.11.tar.gz

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
  GPL+ or Artistic

+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
- BuildRequires are missing

+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no complaints:
  perl-Text-VimColor.noarch: I: checking
  perl-Text-VimColor.src: I: checking
  2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ final provides are sane:
  perl(Text::VimColor) = 0.11
  perl-Text-VimColor = 0.11-1.fc12

- final requires need fixing
  perl(Path::Class) >= 0.02
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1

- %check is present and all tests pass.
  t/01array.t ..... ok
  t/02file.t ...... ok
  t/05xml.t ....... skipped: XML::Parser module required for these tests.
  t/10cmp.t ....... ok
  t/15let.t ....... ok
  t/20override.t .. ok
  t/99pod.t ....... ok
  All tests successful.
  Files=7, Tests=29,  2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr  0.02 sys +  1.64 cusr  0.34
csys =  2.06 CPU)
  Result: PASS

+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

There's a BuildRequires missing for perl(XML::Parser)

You don't need the explicit Requires: perl(Path::Class) since we've had >0.02
for a long time now.

But I think you should add a Requires: vim-enhanced since this package is
pretty useless without it.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list