[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756





--- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com>  2009-04-27 09:52:44 EDT ---
Mat, are there C/C++ bits we're not building?  If so, we should probably either
build them (and make it not noarch, etc.) or remove the comments from the
description about "... C, C++ ..." and rename to lpgjavaruntime.  What do you
think?  Also, we'll need OSGi metadata for DTP, right?  And I don't think we
should be injecting the license if upstream doesn't include it (see [1]).

I'll post a more formal review in a bit.  Thanks for submitting this!

[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.