[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718


Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se>  2009-04-28 09:23:20 EDT ---
Fedora review mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 2009-04-28

* OK
! needs attention

* rpmlint output
  Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package

* Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines

* Spec file is named as the package

* Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines

* The package's license is LGPLv2, which is Fedora approved

* The license is the same as the corresponding native package

* The license file (COPYING) in the sources is packaged as %doc

* The spec file is written in legible English

* Source matches upstream

d8a49db390be5de5965e52ef8d8581f3  plotmm-0.1.2.tar.gz
d8a49db390be5de5965e52ef8d8581f3  SRPM/plotmm-0.1.2.tar.gz

* According to guidelines the version should match the version of the
  corresponding Fedora package - which it does.

* Package builds in mock (Fedora 10)

* BuildRequires look sane

* Owns the directories it creates

* No duplicate files

* %files has %defattr

* %clean clears %buildroot

* Specfile uses macros consistently

* Package does not own other's directories

* %install clears %buildroot

* Installed filenames are valid UTF8



Package approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.