[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 27 15:35:36 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |tcallawa at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tcallawa at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-27 10:35:33 EDT ---
%define ver    20070815

Please don't do this. Just put that in Version: and use %{version}. It will
simplify the spec.

Also, the license tag is wrong. All of the code simply says "GPL", so the tag
should be : License: GPL+

See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F

Also, it looks like the Source0 url is wrong, it should be:

http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/%{name}_%{version}.tar.bz2

And... ncurses-devel is a Requires of readline-devel, so you shouldn't need to
BuildRequires it.

Aside from that, everything looks fine. I'll finish the review, but please show
me a finished package before I can flip the approved flag.

== Review ==
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755
uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755
Safe to ignore.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream (4e10de8e0f5bf681fa295572009518b77fd8a1dd)
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list