[Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 13 15:27:18 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #64 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net>  2009-01-13 10:27:13 EDT ---
ETL is an header-only package, why split in ETL and ETL-devel? I've been told
that you can proceed either way but I think that having only ETL is better.

By the way: are you a sponsored packager (I couldn't find you in the packager
group). If not, you'll have to wait a sponsor to step in and review the

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list