[Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 21 14:34:00 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376





--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com>  2009-01-21 09:33:58 EDT ---
These are all rpmlint warnings/errors that we'd normally ignore.
I'll explain here why:

script-without-shebang [...] libpixman-1.la
 - We use *.la files when linking.  This is explicitly allowed in
   the MinGW guidelines that were passed.
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Libraries_.28DLLs.29

devel-file-in-non-devel-package
 - All MinGW packages are for development only, so when we passed
   the guidelines we didn't opt to have a separate -devel subpackage.
   See bug 468987 for why this warning isn't suppressed.

spurious-executable-perm
 - See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397#c4

arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
 - See bug 468989.

non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
 - This breaks the FHS, but is permitted by the MinGW guidelines.

/me should put this information in a wiki page ...

/me starts https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint ....

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list