[Bug 481513] New: Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 25 21:36:16 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513

           Summary: Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-pippy.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-pippy-25-1.fc10.src.rpm

Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Pippy

Description:
Teaches Python programming by providing access to Python code samples
and a fully interactive Python interpreter.

The user can type and execute simple Python expressions. For example,
it would be possible for a user to write Python statements to calculate
expressions, play sounds, or make simple text animation. 

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081396

rpmlint output:
[fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-pippy-25-1.fc10.src.rpm 
sugar-pippy.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-pippy-25-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 
sugar-pippy.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list