[Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 27 15:46:20 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com>  2009-01-27 10:46:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Adam, will you take this review?

yes, of course. Sorry for late response, I lost this review in my "working


source files match upstream: YES
package meets naming and versioning guidelines: YES
specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently:
dist tag is present: YES
build root is correct: YES
license field matches the actual license: YES
license is open source-compatible. YES
latest version is being packaged: YES
BuildRequires are proper: YES
compiler flags are appropriate: YES
%clean is present: YES
package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): YES
rpmlint is silent: NO but errors are ok for mingw32 package
final provides and requires look sane: NO
owns the directories it creates: YES
no duplicates in %files: YES
file permissions are appropriate: YES
code, not content: YES

Currently I see one problem - win32 binaries are installed:

Is here any reason to have them installed?

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list