[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 28 15:45:56 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |psklenar at redhat.com

--- Comment #4 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com>  2009-01-28 10:45:55 EDT ---
This is my informal review. I cannot sponsor you as I'm not an approved
packager. Your package and specfile seems OK for me:

My review:

+ rpmlint output is clean.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec. There is timespan.spec.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ There is license in separate file in %doc :
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL (md5sum timespan-2.1.tar.gz  c9d545eb5f617b29b3a634d7a0aec39a
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ There isn't duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Package doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
+ All file names in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

+ I did a limited test that the package functions as described, like
'/usr/bin/timespan -l now'
+ Summary and description corresponds package's home.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list