[Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 3 10:10:24 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750


Christian Krause <chkr at plauener.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |chkr at plauener.de




--- Comment #4 from Christian Krause <chkr at plauener.de>  2009-07-03 06:10:23 EDT ---
I would volunteer to do this review. I had a quick look at the package and here
are some thoughts:

* Did you hear anything from upstream regarding 0.11.2?

* The package includes the script "volume-of" which 
- does not work (wrong python module imported)
- has a very generic name
- does not seem to be necessary
- is not mentioned in the README.txt
- has no manpage
I think it can be omitted. ;-)

* The URL of Source0 is different from the download URL mentioned on the
homepage of the project:
http://trash-cli.googlecode.com/files/trash-cli-0.11.1.2.tar.gz

* the usage of %{__...} commands should be consistent - either use them
entirely or omit them completly (the usage of %{__python} for determining
python_sitelib is ok, since it is consistent with the packaging guidelines,
however, I would not use %{__sed} ...)

* Please add a short comment regarding the changes to the source files in the
%prep section

* What's the difference between trash-restore and restore-trash in the package?
The latter doesn't have a man-page...

* IMHO the usage of %{pyver} could be omitted, just use e.g.
%{python_sitelib}/trash_cli*.egg-info

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list