[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 4 07:42:45 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210





--- Comment #28 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>  2009-07-04 03:42:44 EDT ---
> * There is a new upstream version 3.6.3 now.

I'm aware of it but I'm waiting for the new version of ekiga that will work
with it.

> * rpmlint on the installed package complains:
> 
> $ rpmlint opal
> opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2
> /lib64/libdl.so.2
> 
> This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand?

I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now
fixed.

[perobinson at neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal*
../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[perobinson at neo SPECS]$ 

> * There is a new guideline now, that says the license file (actually any doc
> file) should be only in one package. Having it on other subpackages is
> considered as file duplication.

Removed the extra copy of the licence in devel

> * %configure --prefix=/usr
> Please use the %{_prefix} macro  

Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to
specify the prefix :-)

You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor
changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list