[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 4 07:42:45 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210
--- Comment #28 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-07-04 03:42:44 EDT ---
> * There is a new upstream version 3.6.3 now.
I'm aware of it but I'm waiting for the new version of ekiga that will work
with it.
> * rpmlint on the installed package complains:
>
> $ rpmlint opal
> opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2
> /lib64/libdl.so.2
>
> This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand?
I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now
fixed.
[perobinson at neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal*
../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[perobinson at neo SPECS]$
> * There is a new guideline now, that says the license file (actually any doc
> file) should be only in one package. Having it on other subpackages is
> considered as file duplication.
Removed the extra copy of the licence in devel
> * %configure --prefix=/usr
> Please use the %{_prefix} macro
Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to
specify the prefix :-)
You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor
changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list