[Bug 510856] New: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 11 17:02:51 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510856

           Summary: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the
                    naming of an ASCII character
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ascii.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ascii-3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: 
The ascii utility provides easy conversion between various byte
representations and the American Standard Code for Information
Interchange (ASCII) character table. It knows about a wide variety of
hex, binary, octal, Teletype mnemonic, ISO/ECMA code point, slang
names, XML entity names, and other representations. Given any one on
the command line, it will try to display all others. Called with no
arguments it displays a handy small ASCII chart.

$ rpmlint  SPECS/ascii.spec SRPMS/ascii-3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/i586/ascii-*
ascii.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII
ascii.i586: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

mock rebuild for fedora-11-i386 was successful.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list