[Bug 510651] Review Request: trafshow - A tool for real-time network traffic visualization

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 18 00:51:01 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510651


Mads Kiilerich <mads at kiilerich.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mads at kiilerich.com




--- Comment #1 from Mads Kiilerich <mads at kiilerich.com>  2009-07-17 20:51:00 EDT ---
Nice tool! It is less colorful than iptraf but simpler to use for getting a
quick overview of what is going on.

I have reviewed the package and found a couple of minor points:

It seems like the spec comes from altlinux? It would be nice to state the
explicit and give them credit. Perhaps we don't want to keep their old
changelog.

I suggest that URL should point to the english version at
http://soft.risp.ru/trafshow/index_en.shtml . It is just the man page with a
link to a site (in russian) where it can be downloaded. I could however not
connect to the ftp download site and verify. But it seems like they only have
trafshow-4.0.tgz available for download? Where do trafshow-5.2.3.tgz come from?

What do the "upstream dead" comment mean? Do we want a package without a living
upstream? Or is you de facto the upstream and willing to take that
responsibility?

The "cflags" and "make install" "comments" should perhaps just be removed. The
other comment(s) could also be cleaned up.

The %doc INSTALL isn't relevant in the package and shouldn't be included.

There seems to be a spurious tab in the changelog. The spec is also partially
aligned using tabs. Either do it consistently or don't do it.

--
[Looking for sponsor and review on bug 509936]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list