[Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 3 20:00:58 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-06-03 16:00:56 EDT ---
Looks good to me.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   0c0155ad75c3cc73bf3d5a25e7e96e50b7dbf3f7f924c9c84d7f1dec8484925c
   pypar-2.1.0_66.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   mpiext.so()(64bit)
   pypar = 2.1.0_66-2.fc11
   pypar(x86-64) = 2.1.0_66-2.fc11
  =
   libmpi.so.0()(64bit)
   libopen-pal.so.0()(64bit)
   libopen-rte.so.0()(64bit)
   libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
   numpy
   python(abi) = 2.6

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list