[Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615





--- Comment #17 from Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com>  2009-03-03 17:30:51 EDT ---
Parag,

Thank you for your time. I also found some useful tips in the Packaging Note on
you wiki page.  One of them is using the $DESTDIR to specify the
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT during installation.  Therefore, I am making some changes since
this is much cleaner than the code in revision 3. I hope this would not
interrupting your review.

I have posted the new SRPM and spec files here:

Spec URL:
http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-4.fc11/CodeAnalyst-gui.spec

SRPM URL:
http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-4.fc11/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-4.fc11.src.rpm
(From a scratch build against fc11 on Koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1217770)

Changes:
- Using "%configure" macro instead of "./configure".
- Using DESTDIR variable instead of the $prefix and $libdir variable during
installation. This requires adding the patch01 (ca-destdir.patch).
- Clean up the file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.