[Bug 488911] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge-Simple - Recursively merge two or more hashes, simply

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 06:06:14 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge-Simple - Recursively merge two or more hashes, simply

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488911

           Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge-Simple - Recursively
                    merge two or more hashes, simply
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
               URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Hash-Merge-Simple
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Hash-Merge-Simple.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Hash-Merge-Simple-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm

Description:
Hash::Merge::Simple will recursively merge two or more hashes and return
the result as a new hash reference. The merge function will descend and
merge hashes that exist under the same node in both the left and right
hash, but doesn't attempt to combine arrays, objects, scalars, or
anything else. The rightmost hash also takes precedence, replacing
whatever was in the left hash if a conflict occurs. This code was pretty
much taken straight from Catalyst::Utils, and modified to handle more
than 2 hashes at the same time.

Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1225712

*rt-0.05

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list