[Bug 488968] New: Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 15:41:38 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968

           Summary: Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora
                    application data
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: richard at hughsie.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/fedora-app-install.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/fedora-app-install-20090306-1.src.rpm

Description: Fedora application data such as icons and translations for
applications not yet installed. This package is designed to be updated every
few months as new applications are added and translations are updated.

This only includes data from the fedora rawhide repository, as other
repositories will be packaged and merged using the app-install framework.

This data will be used in application browsers such as gnome-app-install and
gpk-app-install in future versions of gnome-packagekit.

See http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/05/application-installing/ and
http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/06/application-installing-ii/ for
background.

rpmlint fedora-app-install-20090306-1.src.rpm
fedora-app-install-20090306-1.noarch.rpm
fedora-app-install.noarch: W: no-documentation

I'm not quite sure what licence to use in this spec file, as the icons in the
packages will be marked with different licences, and I'm not sure if you can
mark an icon (the binary) or a translation as GPLv2+. Advice welcome.

This review depends on the review for app-install,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488962

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list