[Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tcallawa at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tcallawa at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-03-06 15:14:29 EDT ---
Review done on:

http://homes.merjis.com/~rich/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gnutls-2.6.3-5.fc11.src.rpm

You should be sure to update this to 2.6.4 before you commit to rawhide.

== REVIEW ==

Good:

- rpmlint checks return nothing
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets MinGW packaging guidelines
- same patch and configure opts as normal package
- license (GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- modified tarball okay
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- locales handled properly
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

It feels odd for these packages to not have proper -devel packages, but I
suppose that is just how MinGW is.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.