[Bug 488359] Review Request: dcbd - daemon and configuration tool for data center bridging

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 9 10:28:30 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488359


Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(dan at danny.cz)     |




--- Comment #5 from Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz>  2009-03-09 06:28:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > - upstream download page says that 0.9.4 is the latest version
> > (https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42302) => check with
> > upstream
> 
> I got this direct from Intel.  I can harass them to update the stuff on their
> sourceforge page, but this is the latest.

That's what I have expected :-) It's not a blocker, the source URL works, but
should be fixed.

> > - wants to build with the included libconfig => BuildRequires: libconfig-devel
> > is missing, but then it fails to build on Rawhide due some undefined symbols
> > during linking
> 
> Can you paste of attach the build failure message?  I was able to build and
> install it just find on an f11 alpha system.

Did you have "libconfig-devel" installed?

> > - are the headers alone in -devel subpackage (no library there) useful for any
> > development?  
> 
> They are useful for anyone who might want to write an app that builds on the
> infrastructure in place and used by dcbtool/dcbd.  I think it could probably be
> dropped though.  

OK

Jan should be already in contact with you, because he was designated as the
maintainer of dcbd package in the BaseOS Engineering.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list