[Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419





--- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com>  2009-03-09 10:52:28 EDT ---
Ah, my mistake. I might have been accidentally using the F-10 version of
mingw32-fontconfig (from the MinGW test repo) together with the rest of the
already-merged Rawhide stack. I've been unwell for the past few days too, so
sorry for the delay.

MUST

- rpmlint
  manpage-not-gzipped: pango-querymodules.1

  this should probably not be packaged, as MinGW developers should have the
  docs from the native pango anyway

+ package name
+ spec file name
+ package guideline-compliant
+ license complies with guidelines
+ license field accurate
+ license file not deleted
+ spec in US English
+ spec legible
+ source matches upstream
+ builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded
+ build dependencies complete
N/A locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale
N/A library -> ldconfig
N/A relocatable: give reason
+ own all directories
+ no dupes in %files
+ permission
+ %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ macros used consistently
+ Package contains code
+ static in -static
+ if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig
+ clean buildroot before install
+ filenames UTF-8

SHOULD
- if license text missing, ask upstream to include it
- desc and summary contain translations if available
? package build in mock on all architectures
+ package functioned as described
+ scriplets are sane
+ other subpackages should require versioned base
+ if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package
+ require package not files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.