[Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 13 05:34:26 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037





--- Comment #16 from Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com>  2009-03-13 01:34:26 EDT ---
Here is an updated spec and srpm:
http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tinycc-0.9.24-4.fc10.src.rpm
http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tinycc.spec


The static is required to even think about running, so I merged that into the
main package.  Devel is need for some programs but not all, I am not sure what
to do, it is small and anything requiring stdio.h will require it.

I do not see why this would be bad here and ok with gcc?
tinycc-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

The program has (from what I understand) and inherent SELinux issue.  To run
correctly you need to disable the SELinux bool for memheap protection.  What
should I do with this.  You can still compile and run, which defeats most of
the purpose (still 10 time faster then gcc for may compiles).

As for being arch specific, I could see it go either way. I would be leaning
towards yes, because of float.h which sets some variable sizes which may be
different in 64bit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list