[Bug 489614] Review Request: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin - Perl extension for MIT Kerberos 5 admin interface

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489614


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-03-13 14:07:12 EDT ---
Well, the latter is what's already there, so I'll just go ahead.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   273a9866a5b927315e98518ac2aeb3083effb58816815122923d3fac4ae5c29e  
   Authen-Krb5-Admin-0.11.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   Admin.so()(64bit)
   perl(Authen::Krb5::Admin) = 0.11
   perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin = 0.11-1.fc11
   perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin(x86-64) = 0.11-1.fc11
  =
   libcom_err.so.2()(64bit)
   libcrypto.so.8()(64bit)
   libkadm5clnt.so.5()(64bit)
   libkadm5clnt.so.5(kadm5clnt_5_MIT)(64bit)
   libkrb5.so.3()(64bit)
   perl >= 0:5.004
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
   perl(AutoLoader)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(DynaLoader)
   perl(Exporter)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)

* %check is necessarily disabled.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.