[Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 13 18:24:23 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037
--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-03-13 14:24:21 EDT ---
> I do not see why this would be bad here and ok with gcc?
> tinycc-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
Well, rpm -ql gcc and look at what gcc puts into /usr/lib/gcc (even on x86_64,
interestingly). All sorts of object files and libraries, along with some
headers. Look at what this package puts into /usr/lib/tcc: Some header files.
Hence the question about whether they are arch-dependent and whether they would
be better in /usr/share. I don't think it's a huge issue, but the question was
worth asking. If you believe the files are arch specific (or would be if this
worked on anything other than i386) then I think the files are OK where they
are.
As for the selinux issue, please ask fedora-selinux-list for guidance. You may
be able to get some help there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list