[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034





--- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com>  2009-03-16 08:57:03 EDT ---
rpmlint says:

coccinelle.src:77: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
coccinelle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h

See comment 2 for both of these.

coccinelle.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/dllpycaml_stubs.so

See comment 12.

coccinelle-examples.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/coccinelle-examples-0.1.5/demos/launch.sh
coccinelle-examples.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/coccinelle-examples-0.1.5/demos/launch.sh R

I believe rpmlint is wrong here, and/or the packaging guidelines
aren't sufficiently specific about whether examples scripts can be
executable.  See:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/thread.html#00355
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487527#c3

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.