[Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804





--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net>  2009-03-21 13:45:05 EDT ---
Haven't had a look at the update rpms yet, so just some answers:


> If possible I'd like to continue using the same spec in Fedora
> and in the OBS to make openSUSE rpms too.

I'm not aware of any policy that disallows this. However, history has shown
that it's more convenient to keep spec files distribution-specific and clean.

Often distribution-independent spec files are expanded with many conditional
sections, which reduce readability and sometime even cause side-effects. This
can get really ugly in places where you must use Fedora-specific macros or
scriptlet fragments. And also in the %changelog.


> License: LGPLv2+, Boost, Copyright only
>
> I'm not sure how to chain them though.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios


> %makeinstall

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.