[Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826





--- Comment #11 from Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz>  2009-03-26 07:20:27 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I don't think there is anything else I can reasonably check.  I didn't paste in
> a run through my usual checklist but I did look over everything that I could
> actually check.

We hope to have Fedora/s390x installable during late April or early May. And
with the Hercules emulator anybody can try it.

> There's one issue I see, which I don't think is major: the license on the
> metapackage is a bit confusing, because it only contains a single text file
> which isn't itself "GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and CPL".  I don't really know what's
> appropriate, but I don't think that using the union of the licenses of the
> packages that will be pulled in is any worse than saying "Public Domain" or
> whatever.
>
> There's also the interesting question of whether LD_PRELOAD is considered
> "linking" and how that intersects with the incompatibility of the CPL with
> other licenses.  I don't think it matters for this package because, among the
> binaries included in this package, there's no GPL/CPL linking going on as far
> as I can tell.

I see you have already opened that on fedora-legal, thanks.

> Anyway, this package looks vastly better than the original, and I don't see
> anything else to complain about.  Thanks for your patience.

Well, it's rather me who should thank for patience.

> APPROVED  

Thanks for the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.