[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696





--- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-03-26 10:22:33 EDT ---
Sorry for late reply.

(In reply to comment #24)
> I'll explain my plan a little further because it may be a little controversial.
> 
> Since this package is a little hard to package (with or without mod_passenger),
> I was thinking I could ship rubygem-passenger, and out-comment all the parts
> that have to do with mod_passenger (and thus not ship, compile or include
> mod_passenger itself, just the .spec semantics, out-commented). That way,
> downstream users that want mod_passenger can derive from the .spec and .srpm
> already in Fedora.
> 
> However, my primary concern is that we would be shipping an intolerable SRPM
> (since the conflicting licenses prevent the sources from being shipped together
> as one).
> 
> Could you let me know what you think? Thanks!  

I don't think we can provide srpm which cannot build within Fedora's
policy and which needs fixing to compile.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.