[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100





--- Comment #27 from Philippe Makowski <makowski.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-03-28 07:06:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> * I, personally, don't like naming scheme at all. 
In fact neitheir do I ;) but see below explanations

> I suspect that adding
> lib-prefixes and "2" as postfix for library-subpackages  is redundant. Ad one
> more - why so many servers (classic, super and related subpackages) and related
> utils-subpackages? However, this may be generally accepted naming scheme among
> firebird-users, but in any case - please explain it. 
Firebird exist in to Flavor : 
Classic server and SuperServer cf
http://firebirdsql.org/manual/qsg2-classic-or-super.html

Firebird project build the two flavor as two packages
Mandriva, Debian chose the way you see it, on meta package with subpackages.

I'm no against the idea of reworking the naming schema, but do you have some
suggestion ?

I will work on others problems, thanks for the report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.