[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 3 13:53:17 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736





--- Comment #9 from David Sugar <dyfet at gnutelephony.org>  2009-05-03 09:53:16 EDT ---
That is a rather interesting question.  Traditionally I have always shipped
static libs as part of the -devel package just in case someone does actually
want to build static linked, although I imagine is likely extremely rare to see
this happen anymore for anything produced for a mainline distro (embedded on
the other hand certainly...) outside I think of perhaps those who are creating
proprietary/source secret binaries and I have no interest in that myself. 
Shipping static libs as a separate -static package seems acceptable to me, just
like the debug package is separate from devel.

The reason I set attr for ucommon-config is that automake/autoconf generated
Make kept dropping the execute attribute when installing that file.

All these changes I will add.  I recall that historically %configure only had
set CFLAGS with RPM_OPT_FLAGS, and NOT CXXFLAGS (hence C++ never by default
built with optimizations).  I gather this has changed...

I like all of these comments and changes...I will also feed them back into the
tarball generated spec upstream...

Updated:

http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-2.src.rpm
http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list