[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 3 18:26:48 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-05-03 14:26:46 EDT ---
Assigning.

Before doing full-review
- Why is %install section empty this time?
- Please consider to use %?dist tag:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag
- Is this the expected behavior on ucommon-config.in?
----------------------------------------------------------------
    16  if [ "`ldd /bin/sh | grep lib64`" = "" ]
    17  then
    18      libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
    19  else
    20      libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib64
    21  fi
....
....
    56      case "$1" in
    57      --prefix=*)
    58          prefix=$optarg
    59          includedir=$prefix/include
    60          libdir=$prefix/lib
    61          ;;
----------------------------------------------------------------
  Here when --prefix or --exec_prefix is specified, libdir
  will always points to XXXXX/lib even on 64 bits architecture.

- Please follow Fedora's %changelog format:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs

! For sipwitch please submit a new review request for the
  package and make this review request block the review
  request for sipwitch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list