[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 3 18:26:48 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-05-03 14:26:46 EDT ---
Assigning.
Before doing full-review
- Why is %install section empty this time?
- Please consider to use %?dist tag:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag
- Is this the expected behavior on ucommon-config.in?
----------------------------------------------------------------
16 if [ "`ldd /bin/sh | grep lib64`" = "" ]
17 then
18 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
19 else
20 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib64
21 fi
....
....
56 case "$1" in
57 --prefix=*)
58 prefix=$optarg
59 includedir=$prefix/include
60 libdir=$prefix/lib
61 ;;
----------------------------------------------------------------
Here when --prefix or --exec_prefix is specified, libdir
will always points to XXXXX/lib even on 64 bits architecture.
- Please follow Fedora's %changelog format:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
! For sipwitch please submit a new review request for the
package and make this review request block the review
request for sipwitch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list