[Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069





--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-05-05 01:56:22 EDT ---
The License should be GPLv2+ at least or maybe even GPLv3.

Not sure if ghc-rpm-macros should not require ghc - macros.ghc is not really
useful without it.
On the other hand any package that uses the macros will also need to BR ghc I
guess anyway,
but still it does not seem unreasonable to require ghc in my opinion.

Otherwise looks fine to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.