[Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue May 5 17:44:06 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863
Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-05-05 13:44:05 EDT ---
Good:
+ Package name fits naming guidelines.
+ Basename of the SPEC files fits with package name.
+ Could open URL in URL tag
+ Could download source files with spectool -g
+ Source file matches with upstream version
(md5sum: b47eaa6ae4231a42f4a15564a08eb439)
+ Consistently usage of rpm macros.
+ Package contains valid License tag
+ License tag contains 'Public Domain' as a valid OSS license
+ License fits with copyright note in source file
+ Package contains no verbatin license text
(IMHO this is not required for Public Domain)
+ Package contains no subpackages
+ Local build works fine
+ Rpmlint is quite for source package
+ Rpmlint is quite for binary package
+ Files has proper files permissions
+ Files stanza contains no duplicates
+ Local install and uninstall works fine.
+ Scratch build on koji works fine.
+ Package contains proper %changelog
Bad:
- Why do you don't but the generated readme.txt file no into
the %doc stanza?
- Local test fais.
I have try to copy a mbox file form /var/spool/mail into a
directroy and then call mb2md -s <file>. I have got the following
message: mb2md.pl -s s4504kr
Fatal: Source is not an mbox file or a directory!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list