[Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 7 13:57:55 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855


Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review+              |fedora-review?




--- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org>  2009-05-07 09:57:54 EDT ---
=========
 REVOKED 
=========

the SRPM, i never take a look in the single SPEC-file

mh, I'm in the shit. I didn't see the missing Icon-Cache and the incorrect
ownage. 

The desktop file and the icon stuff is not needed and there are dependencies in
the X. I have a CUI package with a desktop file, too.. So this wasn't a problem
for me. 

Another thing is that the main dependency ccrypt is not available for ppc64. 
---
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.

FAIL!
---

Group: yeah, you are right again.

I'm awfully sorry for making such a trouble...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list