[Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409





--- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli at gmail.com>  2009-05-09 07:46:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> - jar file must have same name as package:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming
> (drop the symlinking and just install %{name}.jar in %_javadir)
> 
> - Same goes with javadocdir, don't version it.

Ok for all other things, but why do you ask that? It seems that most java
packages come versioned and symlinked (for javadoc as well). It is a jpackage
guideline and there seems to be nothing opposing that in Fedora-java
guidelines;
look here:
http://www.jpackage.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/src/jpackage-utils/doc/jpackage-1.5-policy.xhtml?revision=HEAD&root=jpackage#id2480655

Maybe because jargs 1.0 is mature since 2006 and there will hardly be a new
release?

Here are updated spec and srpm (with other fixes but without above, waiting for
explanation):

http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs.spec
http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm

As a side note, other packages originally coming from jpackage have Group:
Development/Libraries/Java instead of Development/Libraries (ie the
jakarta-commons-*.jar), but i used the last one to avoid an rpmlint warning.

cheers (and thanks for your sponsorship!)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.