[Bug 501381] New: Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 18 20:36:31 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381
Summary: Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote
management console used for managing 389
Administration Server and 389 Directory Server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-console.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-console-1.1.3-2.src.rpm
Description: A Java based remote management console used for managing 389
Administration Server and 389 Directory Server.
This is a rename of fedora-idm-console to 389-console.
Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2
md5sum 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2
bbf9b8e74b9746d65b1fd1871a665208 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2
sha1sum 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2
f220b8d5b1b1a737f0744f2eef1e07ed8b5aa460 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2
Compiles cleanly in mock
rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm
389-console.i386: E: no-binary
- the only reason this is not a noarch package is because of the dependency on
jss which has a specific arch
389-console-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package
- this is a java package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list