[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 23 01:08:36 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737





--- Comment #24 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com>  2009-05-22 21:08:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
...
> Should Fix:
> -----------
...
> * Consider renaming the manpages to mathio-<foo> and installing them
Actually, thoses manpages are removed from matio svn trunk. My view is that
they provide the same information as doxygen (since both pdf and manpages are
generated from doxygen). Keeping html doxygen is lightweight and
> * Is it really useful to put the test files in a subpacke, wouldn't it be
> better
>   to run them as %check and not put them in an rpm at all ?  
Nice suggest. I've done that since the test_* file are likely not useful beyond
build time.

All others point are fixed.

Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/matio.spec
SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/matio-1.3.3-3.fc11.src.rpm
Description: Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list