[Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221


Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-05-29 11:38:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Fedora review dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-29
> 

Thank you for the review!

> ? the wine subpackage owns /usr/lib/dssi which is also owned by the
>   dssi package - should the wine subpackage require dssi instead?
> 

There is a subtlety here. I first thought of doing it that way but then I
realized that it would be problematic on x86_64. On x86_64, when someone
installs dssi-vst, the
   dssi-vst.x86_64
   dssi-vst-wine.i586
packages will be installed. If I put a
   Requires: dssi
on the dssi-vst-wine package, it will pull dssi.x86_64 during installation, and
dssi.x86_64 does not own /usr/lib/dssi. The only solution I found was to own
/usr/lib/dssi by dssi-vst-wine.i586 so that we have all directories owned in
all archs.

Please let me know if you find a better solution.


New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: dssi-vst
Short Description: DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins
Owners: oget
Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.