[Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288





--- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-11-06 13:10:17 EDT ---
Some questions:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
29147 2009-10-22 16:50 stonevpn-0.4.3-0.fc11.src/stonevpn-0.4.3.tar.gz
29320 2009-11-07 01:41 stonevpn-0.4.3-2.fc11.src/stonevpn-0.4.3.tar.gz
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- Source tarball changed. Would you explain what happened?
  We expect that if a static URL is used as Source0, its source archive
  does not change (as long as %version or so does not change).

  If the tarball is not the one formally released as "0.4.3" but
  one created from git, please follow:
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
  i.e.
  - Include the revision string of git tree or the date when the tarball
    was created to the tarball name and the release number of the srpm.

- Would you have any plan to submit your patch 
  "pyOpenSSL-0.9-crl_and_revoked.patch" to pyOpenSSL upstream?
  * At least I guess Fedora's pyOpenSSL won't accept this patch
    unless pyOpenSSL upstream accepts it and if you want to support
    CRL with this software on Fedora submitting your patch to
    pyOpenSSL upstream is really needed:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.